Napolitano 20 Million Illegals did not commit Crime
Illegals Crossing into the U.S.
“Illegal immigration is not a crime.” This story keeps showing up in my Reader. And while I know that it’s been covered to death. My original response was what? Sometimes people throw out some stuff, then move on. The attention span of the public seems to be a nano-second these days. One cannot blame us, we are being bombarded by a crisis a day from the jr. admin. from IL and the media is helping.
What can we remember from August 2008? Things were about even in the political race. Immigration and energy were the two big topics. On both counts the liberals were losing. If the price of energy continued upward or even held steady, there were going to be changes in congress and probably a republican president.
Then presto- chango, a crisis came on the horizon. (The economy collapsed in a nano-second there’s that phrase again, so trite, but catchy.) If there had not been a meltdown of the banking system, on our about, September 15th, would we be looking down the barrel of a government coup?
So, on this side of what I believe was the craftily constructed destruction of the credit system, we see that not only are the liberals gunning for the same old political stuff, they have escalated their game to more communist style plays.
We see the back door nationalization of banks as the prime leader in change. Once in control of the money supply and credit, they determine the winners and the losers. Banks that do not play along, will be forced out of business. We see that already with the regional banks who are healthy being singled out through a “stress test” as not fit.
The immigration move was to be expected. How can a communist turn down the idea of 20-30 million more votes by merely signing a law into existence? Usually, the communists have to stuff the ballot box, or imprison the opposition. In the case of legalizing these criminals they can increase the count from 20-30 million to three times that amount by allowing relatives into the country.
If my statistical estimate is correct we could see as many as 90 million new citizens in within 5-10 years. That would be just under 10% of our current population. Do you find that startling?
With the current administration trying to woo extremist factions such as Hamas we may also see a large number hardship immigrations as was the case during the “bubba” years.
As we know, people who opposes the legalization of these criminals are labeled as racists. Since I am already a right wing extremist, guess I’ll just have to live with being called a racist. No, wait, because I went to a Tea Party, I’m a racist. Does my stance on giving amnesty to criminals make me a double racist? If so, do I, not get the $200 stimulus bill money or advance past go?
My website is small and insignificant, so if they come to get me, there won’t be many of you extremists left to exchange ideas with. We’ll all be in the FEMA hooscal? http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=hooscal
While some believe there are not FEMA camps, others are convinced. My take on the situation remains fluid. If one was to calculate the undercurrents being demonstrated by the recent tea parties, and the potential for unrest of epic proportions, then we need FEMA camps. It just makes common sense that someone would be making plans to deal with the unrest.
Finally, if a person opposed amnesty and felt it was an important issue on August 30th, are they still of the same opinion? If so, how will they take the coming blanket amnesty of the hoards of illegals? Do we have a choice. Can we undo the legalization?
Really, think about that, if this summer millions of people become instant U.S. citizens would we be able to reverse the process if the political will were opposed? Do you understand the long term ramifications of mass legalization of criminals and the addition of an estimated 3 dependents for each new citizen?
Why are we not in the face of those in power? Are we just too lazy or are we preoccupied with our iphones?
New blog post: Napolitano 20 Million Illegals did not commit Crime http://tinyurl.com/dg2m4a
First and foremost we are a nation of laws, or as we are all anticipated? But years of previous administrations have neglected the illegal immigrant problem, to the detriment of American workers. Ever since the inception of the 1986 Immigration & Reform Act, signed into law by Ronald Reagan, the politicians have pushed for a new AMNESTY. In addition, anytime a new law has been drafted to combat the illegal immigrant occupation of our country, they have behind closed doors killed it or weakened it’s enactment. The law of given instant citizenship to babies intentionally born here, is a complete misinterpretation of the 14th amendment, after the civil war that emancipated African slaves.
It was never meant for (Anchor Babies) to give pregnant illegal alien mothers the right to legal status? The law has been badly mauled because the children can then draw on US education, free medical care, free baby delivery and after care, low income housing and it is a route to many government handouts. The major problem now facing the Obama White House is are the children of illegal immigrants to blame for their parents breaking the law? Obviously the left-wingers are to blame for this conundrum, but both parties have added to neglect to the sovereign laws of our nation. I think we should follow other countries “Rule of Law” and cement in place that children who have proven themselves can go to a place of higher learning. We desperately need a wide scope of professionals in Engineering, Science and 21st Century technology. But also remember that our government settles the largest population of new immigrants on Earth. What we don’t need is more poorly educated, non-English speaking, impoverished aliens, looking for handouts. Like other developed nations we must be very specific, who we pick and choose as new citizens. We must also restrain ourselves from chain migration, who are liable to become a public charges, because the family sponsors have decided the US taxpayer should carry the financial weight?
We can thank our corrupt liberal politicians, judges in the past as drafting a passive law, instead of entering America being a criminal offense. Now we have uncountable number of illegal aliens squatting here, because of the absolute intentional neglect of our lawmakers. Is there any other country in the world, that makes illegally crossing into their sovereign territory a Civil Crime–I really don’t think so? Our laws deliberately drafted this way in favor of the open border, big Catholic church and special interest groups. To HXXX with the American people, who are forced to fight for their jobs?
But if American defeat the next Amnesty ready to pounce on the unsuspecting legal population, we must make an example in using the 1986 law. We as a people must build-on the E-Verify application, upgrade, modify to extract illegal job applicants from the workplace. Illegal immigrants who have overstayed visas, illegal crossed the border and children must be exempt from any pardon. All children of illegal parents that have committed crimes, been expelled or just deserted school should leave with parents in the usage of self-deportation. This is a compliance way to remove foreign nationals and any criminal businesses that employ them, must receive mandatory, fines, asset confiscation and prison terms. The use of a in-perpetuity E-Verify will be a ultimate deterrent and see movement of illegal labor and families packing and leaving under the term of “ATTRITION” We must force our reluctant politicians to be governed by–THE PEOPLE’S–WILL or face the dire consequences in the election process. This will surely happen when Sen. Reid, Speaker Pelosi and 48 other Senate lawmakers come up for re-election. They underfunded E-Verify, that obviously is working efficiently for them to kill it. Today I have heard Homeland Security Chief Janet Napolitano is approaching State governors to appeal the Real ID Act, that would add national standards for state-issued driver licenses and non-driver identification cards, Revising and tightening the laws on application for asylum and deportation of aliens for terrorist activity. That wouldWaiver laws that interfere with construction of physical barriers at the borders, to name a few statutes. So that means since the new Presidency, the Democratic run Congress are trying to revoke E-Verify and the Real ID act. My guess, is under this regime they will be rescinding the Federal program for State and local police called 247(g) that trains officers to arrest and detain illegal alien criminals.
The open border, free traders, special interest groups will use any contradictions, epithets, racial slurs to annul any new law–which they have done successfully up to now. But American should realize strongly, that this has nothing to do with a persons color, religion or ethnic background–and EVERYTHING–to do with being–CARTE BLANCHE–for parasite employers, who pay nothing to illegal immigrant upkeep? It’s left to Taxpayers? Its everything to do with billions of dollars spent, to pacify the big Catholic church, a portion of Liberal voters and others who see nothing wrong in loading citizens, residents down with sky high taxes. Supposedly the last White House promised no thoughts of a Path to Citizenship until the border was orderly and closed to undesirable With another drafted and secret Amnesty on the House and Senate table, like always–this is not the case. Drug smuggling and incessant illegal immigration is still very prevalent. The rumors from the new White House are clearly signaling another push for AMNESTY?
So go to these sites: VDARE, FAIRUS, JUDICIALWATCH, NUMBERSUSA, AMERICANPATROL, CAPSWEB & ALIPAC. The stakes are sky high because Amnesty means, thousands more will swamp the border looking for yet a 3rd—AMNESTY.
Excellent comments, thank you.
I wanted to sit on a reply for a bit. Excellent points on the E Verify and the lack of enforcement. I am on board with the need to prosecute the employers who willfully violate the laws.
Of concern to me and many others, the Real ID Act. While in theory it makes sense, the impact on State Sovereignty and in turn on individuals seems important. Yes, I know that it’s for the greater good, but still, I prefer the my State to set the rules on most things. If the federal government can work with states to get enforcement, in my opinion, that’s a much better situation.
Thanks again for the comments.