Notice the Chin
He’s a Nazi or Not
Last year when I was posting pictures of Hitler and Nazi Germany in reference to the jr. admin. from IL I am sure I lost readers. Last year it would have been hard for most people to believe a national party in the USA would be offering a totalitarian puppet for president of the Republic. Today the average citizen probably thinks Beck, Rush and those such as myself are loonies for suggesting we are in the midst of a Marxist coup.
‘Truth is stranger than fiction’ as they say. So be it today in our Republic. We have a group fronted by the classic “snake oil salesman” bent on implementing a totalitarian government. Just as last year a passer-by to my website would have said, “looney,” today most will think me crazy.
I suggest one look at facts. The menu is rather obvious after one gets past the “snake oil” it’s all Marxist. One should not confuse the media’s portrayal of GW as a fascist with my reference to the jr. admin. practices as fascist. The media and writers such as Naomi Wolf tried to paint GW into the box of fascist using comparisons to Hitler’s Germany. While their facts regarding Hitler may or may not have been correct the comparison was bogus.
Totalitarians are birds of a feather. Label them Communists, Marxists, or Fascists they are after one thing– Control. Their methods of control are similar- usually brute force. The systems put into place by totalitarians limit choices and activities by citizens. With both Marxism and Fascism someone ends up at the wrong end of a gun.
On the other end of the spectrum are Anarchists. They do not believe in any government. I suggest that while Bill Ayers and Jeff Jones may have been Communists when starting the SDS, they were and still are Anarchists. I would also lump BLT (Black Liberation Theology) into that class.
These individuals and philosophies may find solace in the concept of communism, when put into place, the restrictions on them will be no less comfortable than their perceived social prison of today. Yes, communism sounds all “warm and fuzzy.” In theory, communism is a great system for a local group of hippies who have very little drive and even less direction in their lives. Expand the system beyond a few very social individuals and there’s a problem. Not everyone wants to give up their labors to support the dead heads in the corner.
For the “everybody’s equal” theory to work with large populations, force must come into play. Which is exactly what history has taught us about communism in reality. A commune made up of free thinking individualists will not survive for long. Is that not what the average U.S. citizen was? And have we not become dulled by the constant political correctness assault?
No, Bill and Jeff are not communists, they are rebels. Spoiled brats who were never taught the need for order and discipline in one’s own life, self regulated. That was the era which started the slow decline in our culture, “free love, sex and drugs.” The adults of that generation failed miserably in raising their children and we are paying a price for their complacency.
The control of information by a central group would come under the term of dictatorial. Dictators may think of themselves as benevolent, but in practice they become totalitarian rulers. The jr. admin. from IL is nothing more than window dressing on a group bent on establishing a Marxist government for their own benefit. Some are driven by greed, some by the lust for power, all are bent on destroying the Republic.
August 28, 2009 12:34 AM PDT
Bill would give president emergency control of Internet
Internet companies and civil liberties groups were alarmed this spring when a U.S. Senate bill proposed handing the White House the power to disconnect private-sector computers from the Internet.
They’re not much happier about a revised version that aides to Sen. Jay Rockefeller, a West Virginia Democrat, have spent months drafting behind closed doors. CNET News has obtained a copy of the 55-page draft of S.773 (excerpt), which still appears to permit the president to seize temporary control of private-sector networks during a so-called cybersecurity emergency.
The new version would allow the president to “declare a cybersecurity emergency” relating to “non-governmental” computer networks and do what’s necessary to respond to the threat. Other sections of the proposal include a federal certification program for “cybersecurity professionals,” and a requirement that certain computer systems and networks in the private sector be managed by people who have been awarded that license.
